Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

LF: RE: Topband ?

from [James Cowburn] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: RE: Topband ?
From: "James Cowburn" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:02:07 -0000
Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 10.216.139.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=[email protected]
In-reply-to: <CAA8k23SoHnXMRFmc6xkBQ4dmFmeFWF_W71Sz6QnxzSm5hUTqZA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: Acz4WOuT1Op821qgRoywyrZcsz3yXAAAkMbg

You should post this on UKRA, would be a great fuel for troll! Alternatively write into RADCOM about it, you can imagine the stream of correspondence ensuing, surpassed only by any questions on correct way to earth a station/PME etc!   J

 

Jim G7NKS (rooting for more litz wire in garage)

 

 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andy Talbot
Sent: 02 March 2012 09:42
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Topband ?

 

From 1 Jan 2013, won't Topband  have to be renamed ?

1810 - 2000kHz, =  "almost-but-not-quite-topband"

 

Always thought is should have been called Bottom Band.

The real "Topband" is 275GHz

 

Andy

 

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: Topband ?, Andy Talbot
Next by Date:  Re: LF: NoV Extension, Roger Lapthorn
Previous by Thread:  LF: Topband ?, Andy Talbot
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Topband ?, Daniel Ankers
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]