Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Topband ?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Topband ?
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:26:32 +0000
Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 10.180.92.34 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass header.i=[email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=31tDBpkh3/OgUb2lk7g5iftcSXL16QcdtzWGAzaRfBc=; b=ZwJYfBmmJW9gZ5D9+9A1SQ9+3m3psEaQw62XOT/XdzeiRTPG/mGUegNkdf++yA/Tw3 TFL0ZRX351m/J/uEnLJAGg7BqcPvrNPxQBOXE6UDpTL6EZmxM96PnHzLQhOGZteG8Myx S69RlWHUVGeKQ9LCgG3cG//TN99FpBBB4iBvwM2mJzenUk+2EM/Pr+mygpSqVc16MAMD JKplWmdSvreM00lQP9lHnMClH7z+BobFGYJCRALp3F1fruWdB1grxM7X3CBYPKZJ8pOs 4bQ8uG+6iM2WJYY2z2R+nmWe+pIDfaoHsBW2l1eyld8hoQZ9ICXsAZ3iZTdPrRR9ZA9Z F5pA==
In-reply-to: <CACQ0XpLG-S=a9sLhqy_DEAT_MeXBnn88ngGoyoGUTtDw4Br9EQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA8k23SoHnXMRFmc6xkBQ4dmFmeFWF_W71Sz6QnxzSm5hUTqZA@mail.gmail.com> <CACQ0XpLG-S=a9sLhqy_DEAT_MeXBnn88ngGoyoGUTtDw4Br9EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
And don't forget 8.7-9.1kHz that some of us use under NoV.

73s
Roger G3XBM

On 2 March 2012 10:18, Daniel Ankers <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2 March 2012 09:42, Andy Talbot <[email protected]> wrote:
> From 1 Jan 2013, won't Topband  have to be renamed ?
> 1810 - 2000kHz, =  "almost-but-not-quite-topband"
>
> Always thought is should have been called Bottom Band.
> The real "Topband" is 275GHz

But Shirley it's not been Topband since 30th January 1998 when 136kHz
became available?

Dan MD1CLV




--
http://qss2.blogspot.com/
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>