To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Topband ? |
From: | Daniel Ankers <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:32:15 +0000 |
Authentication-results: | mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 10.52.180.98 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <CAHAQVWP50reKq1HsU61HG22BJRYZqw=khJW0Swo2rhg_z=YGYQ@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <CAA8k23SoHnXMRFmc6xkBQ4dmFmeFWF_W71Sz6QnxzSm5hUTqZA@mail.gmail.com> <CACQ0XpLG-S=a9sLhqy_DEAT_MeXBnn88ngGoyoGUTtDw4Br9EQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHAQVWP50reKq1HsU61HG22BJRYZqw=khJW0Swo2rhg_z=YGYQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On 2 March 2012 10:26, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> wrote: > And don't forget 8.7-9.1kHz that some of us use under NoV. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM I wasn't, but since G4JNT wasn't including the current NoVs for 500kHz I assumed that NoVs on 9kHz wouldn't count either. Otherwise 73kHz could also be included. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Topband ?, Roger Lapthorn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: RSGB Membership - Bit off topic., David Pratt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Topband ?, Roger Lapthorn |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Topband ?, John Rabson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |