Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Topband ?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Topband ?
From: Daniel Ankers <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:32:15 +0000
Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 10.52.180.98 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=[email protected]
In-reply-to: <CAHAQVWP50reKq1HsU61HG22BJRYZqw=khJW0Swo2rhg_z=YGYQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA8k23SoHnXMRFmc6xkBQ4dmFmeFWF_W71Sz6QnxzSm5hUTqZA@mail.gmail.com> <CACQ0XpLG-S=a9sLhqy_DEAT_MeXBnn88ngGoyoGUTtDw4Br9EQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHAQVWP50reKq1HsU61HG22BJRYZqw=khJW0Swo2rhg_z=YGYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
On 2 March 2012 10:26, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> wrote:
> And don't forget 8.7-9.1kHz that some of us use under NoV.
>
> 73s
> Roger G3XBM

I wasn't, but since G4JNT wasn't including the current NoVs for 500kHz
I assumed that NoVs on 9kHz wouldn't count either.  Otherwise 73kHz
could also be included.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>