Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Topband ? |
| From: | Daniel Ankers <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:18:52 +0000 |
| Authentication-results: | mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 10.52.70.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
| In-reply-to: | <CAA8k23SoHnXMRFmc6xkBQ4dmFmeFWF_W71Sz6QnxzSm5hUTqZA@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <CAA8k23SoHnXMRFmc6xkBQ4dmFmeFWF_W71Sz6QnxzSm5hUTqZA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
On 2 March 2012 09:42, Andy Talbot <[email protected]> wrote: > From 1 Jan 2013, won't Topband have to be renamed ? > 1810 - 2000kHz, = "almost-but-not-quite-topband" > > Always thought is should have been called Bottom Band. > The real "Topband" is 275GHz But Shirley it's not been Topband since 30th January 1998 when 136kHz became available? Dan MD1CLV |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: NoV Extension, Roger Lapthorn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Topband ?, Roger Lapthorn |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: Topband ?, James Cowburn |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Topband ?, Roger Lapthorn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |