Re: LF: opera 137 beacon going

[Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com>]

Doubtful or not - it can and has been done.   I also know of someone
who can read Morse at that same sort of speed, (about 50WPM or so,
isn't it ?)

What's the difference, apart from coding?


And yes, we all know RTTY is ancient - what's your point?
and by the way, Amateur RTTY is 45.45baud on HF, not 50

'jnt


On 11 January 2012 15:35, mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> wrote:
> RTTY using the 5 unit International Murray code is old HAT  eg 24 is R 135
> is Y etc and can easily be read from a tape or visual display and the normal
> speed is 50 bauds. Whether it was read by Ear is doubtful.
> g3kev
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Rabson" <john.rabson@numeo.fr>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 11:24 AM
> Subject: Re: LF: opera 137 beacon going
>
>
> I was once told that some members of the Russian High Speed club could read
> 45 baud RTTY by ear.
>
> Perhaps Mal has some learning to do?
>
> F5VLF
>
> On 11 Jan 2012, at 11:56CET, mal hamilton wrote:
>
>> Well Andy I take it you are not keen on Morse. It is so exciting with a
>> human in Control,  your own brain doing all the work instead of watching a
>> Black Box. Amazing stuff some would say.
>> First Time did you say ?? I recall reading your article about a 700W TX
> you
>> built and you state it BLEW UP several times before it settled down !!
>> Buckets of zapped FETS
>> G3KEV
>>
>
>
>
>