To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: noise on VK and earth dipole tests |
From: | Dimitrios Tsifakis <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:20:15 +1100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IyMj8HulxolQrMsRu1KOsDoabaN3erVqG4NyqhgvW2g=; b=A9eq+uoIuqb23wpCKfaIcEa+lM6KiQr0JeUYZ/Tkl/9OrTVhWlmMI349huJgJh0tQS uRDHVDDX9hhUHLhGtcasoOdamnDt8G+Z6ePnDHxlwl7jkjwZHUAwOO34zZz4nARxw2pG vxGSI1udq7sxPx5sDSYVji9y1DjlBXA1vFqeo= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <CAKvcm2d-GA=EajQfQCS54WncqBsFwA5GjpgQpuPcjrtP_rePag@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi John, 2011/10/12 John Rabson <[email protected]>: > Amongst other things, it depends on the geology. G3XBM has managed 5.6 km > with 5 W RF at very low frequency. On 87 kHz with 4W SSB (cave radio) in > limestone, the best I know of is 1.6 km two way and 2.5 km one way in the > French alps. Well, the S/N required for voice is much higher than that of QRSS30. With a puny 3 W of RF and QRSS30 it seems I can cover a distance of about 30 km and still have a S/N of 30 dB! Which implies that possibly (if the signal received is normal ground wave, similar to that from an above-ground antenna), with a spreading loss of 6 dB per doubling of distance and with a bit more juice, much greater distances may be covered. > It is always worth trying. That's the spirit in the amateur world of LF! :-) 73, Dimitris VK1SV |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Emailing: capt02 (2), Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Emailing: capt02 (2), Albert |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: noise on VK and earth dipole tests, John Rabson |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: noise on VK and earth dipole tests, John Rabson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |