Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: 136.172 T/A |
| From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:53:28 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <009101cc6db5$d1702e80$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <000401cc6dbb$346a10a0$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <00a701cc6dbc$75bd20f0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Bill,Not sure which FFT settings Argo uses for QRSS-60. These should be equal to be compared. Usually Argo uses smaller FFT bandwidths, maybe something arround 10...15 mHz? Someone can comment, perhaps... 73, Stefan Am 08.09.2011 02:22, schrieb Bill de Carle: I just started up an ARGO screen using the same input signal. I'd like to compare ARGO vs Spectrum Lab and also my QTH here vs Jay's QTH nearer the ocean. I'll post the ARGO screens later.Bill VE2IQ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Looks like you are both coming in now, Stefan Schäfer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Looks like you are both coming in now, mal hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: 136.172 T/A, Bill de Carle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: 136.172 T/A, John Andrews |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |