Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: ROS

from [Gary - G4WGT] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: ROS
From: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 20:27:41 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0UtmfTEYDYd+8vWkjo2++//oiImtebD0JOYrsr20q94=; b=FAgBJsvriQqr8ChV1JaWD0fwXsRu6bDSPLqKfrQIq2ft1hzOlnbIRDTDt49pLbDsDJ NuJcMhwgZwLZvLXZn4qG9SlBhN+U0t8IM3y2cFjBm2Og5t2MlBdcQlwyhVGkeI+xm6S0 pBe71V/NM3yz1GQal9F8NGnlrGXGRt1h0Z4z8=
In-reply-to: <009e01cc699e$c53c14a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <001201cc6943$47f18e40$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <008e01cc6994$8c75fa00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <CAJStiw7VGJ9Zm9pjusMdwRX1iBhaZixYzMnSgq_sX7TJMjSkWA@mail.gmail.com> <009e01cc699e$c53c14a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
OK Mal,

Now I see you point.

I once had the same/similar problem not able to decode strong signals. The setting of the Rx volume (sound card level) should be set on the VU (volume) meter to be 4 to 5 dB, that's in the last green segment next to the red one. After I had made that adjustment there is no problen decoding even signals buried in the noise.

I hope that helps if you wish to try ROS again.

Gary - G4WGT.


On 2 September 2011 19:33, mal hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:
I understand, but I was not.  Considering the volume of signals visible at my QTH, but I did copy one complete line from the GM station, who was probably the weakest, also as pointed out I kept getting via the internet other freqs and acty that I did not want.
The prog also crashed 3 times, not the PC. It does not look attractive. I was able to see all the signals active on the waterfall and had it been qrs 3 I could have copied all of the information instead of waiting and waiting and nothing happened
Others are are also critical about this mode on LF es MF
Why did I copy one station and not the others especially the strong ones ?
mal/g3kev
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS

Mal,

Did you mis-understand ?

I was getting 100% decodes from Finbar & John even though there was no audible or visual signal.

Cheers, Gary - G4WGT.


On 2 September 2011 18:20, mal hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:
You have just verified what I have always said.
Yes keep an open mind and experiment but in the end all will come to the same conclusion as Yourself.
QRSS/DFCW.
Over the years I have had a multitude of private emails saying the same thing. We are not alone !!
de g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS

On 9/2/2011 12:38 AM, mal hamilton wrote:
While it is interesting to experiment with different modes
Mal is this really you?

I agree with you on the QRSS/DFCW comment!




[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Microhertzing at LF:, Markus Vester
Next by Date:  LF: Re: 137.7679kHz QRSS30 beacon - reports please, Roger Lapthorn
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: ROS, mal hamilton
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: ROS, Scott Tilley
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]