Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: WIPE OUT

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: WIPE OUT
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:20:07 +0100
References: <000e01cc6411$08bb3550$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><[email protected]><002401cc641a$ab62adc0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <CAPcxh4PmyeutWp88FPLe=i2N8k8y6=YGoJSmFs2mdm_BTkrpMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: LF: WIPE OUT

.... Scarborough?

On Friday, August 26, 2011, mal hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:
> A bad location for a LF operator. It might be worth considering a move of QTH to a QRN free zone
>  
>  
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 6:37 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: WIPE OUT
> All the time the same questions?
> Take a look at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/Lightnings.png
> or http://www.blitzortung.org/Webpages/index.php?lang=en&page=1
>
> Is there maybe a difference between my and your QTH?
>
> 73, Stefan
>
>
> Am 26.08.2011 18 <tel:26.08.2011%2018>:56, schrieb mal hamilton:
>
> Stefan
> You grabber looks washed out at times, is it the antenna you use ?
> I do not get this problem with my wire antennas, it copes with all eventualities
> de mal/g3kev
>  

Attachment: capt1108261918.jpg
Description: Binary data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>