Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: WIPE OUT

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: WIPE OUT
From: Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:12:39 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FmkJBWuR6defrsuZ3sN5xmVQM2j/FrBdcBSbakzwiCk=; b=R0/iueg2JeoxUVLW/ibFaqWxX29BDsJbrtLgKdSaT0BOZcVG0AtiXTJwYck2D9EC9l sL3ODb2IDdP7Q5d3YytpikNUxZQDflejg5L+5bS+RMUCKqrV9LpvqE3DKx5Js3Enw5g2 lYiJnCDyJFIvCIMS95bHtgI14Te9kiM3dtjjQ=
In-reply-to: <002401cc641a$ab62adc0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <000e01cc6411$08bb3550$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <002401cc641a$ab62adc0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
.... Scarborough?

On Friday, August 26, 2011, mal hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:
> A bad location for a LF operator. It might be worth considering a move of QTH to a QRN free zone
>  
>  
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 6:37 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: WIPE OUT
> All the time the same questions?
> Take a look at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/Lightnings.png
> or http://www.blitzortung.org/Webpages/index.php?lang=en&page=1
>
> Is there maybe a difference between my and your QTH?
>
> 73, Stefan
>
>
> Am 26.08.2011 18 <tel:26.08.2011%2018>:56, schrieb mal hamilton:
>
> Stefan
> You grabber looks washed out at times, is it the antenna you use ?
> I do not get this problem with my wire antennas, it copes with all eventualities
> de mal/g3kev
>  
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>