Re: LF: WIPE OUT

[Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>]

Stefan

If you moved to Scarborough Mal would always be visible on your grabber and we could all get some peace and quiet. :-))

73s
Roger

On 26 August 2011 19:20, mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> wrote:

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Minto Witteveen

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 7:12 PM

Subject: Re: LF: WIPE OUT

.... Scarborough?

On Friday, August 26, 2011, mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> wrote:
> A bad location for a LF operator. It might be worth considering a move of QTH to a QRN free zone
>  
>  
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 6:37 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: WIPE OUT
> All the time the same questions?
> Take a look at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/Lightnings.png
> or http://www.blitzortung.org/Webpages/index.php?lang=en&page=1
>
> Is there maybe a difference between my and your QTH?
>
> 73, Stefan
>
>
> Am 26.08.2011 18 <tel:26.08.2011%2018>:56, schrieb mal hamilton:
>
> Stefan
> You grabber looks washed out at times, is it the antenna you use ?
> I do not get this problem with my wire antennas, it copes with all eventualities
> de mal/g3kev
>  

-- 
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/