|
Of course, Stefan :-) ! Yesss, I would! It is the dream only. But ... why not?
73!
Lubos
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:08:51 +0200 From: [email protected]To: [email protected]Subject: Re: LF: OK2BVG-DK7FC
Hi Lubos,
Wow, that sounds like a good project! You are a real active radio
amateur! Hope you'll get the chimney and generate a good signal,
visible in 600 or so. And i hope for some LF CW QSOs soon too. Would
you be interested? :-) :-)
73 es GL!
Stefan/DK7FC
Am 05.04.2011 10:53, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG:
Hello
Stefan!
You are right, I would like to see your VLF DFCW-3 signal again ![Veselý obličej]( "Veselý obličej") .
As for my plans ... I will have to find out more better QTH for
transmission. There is lots of as high as my antenna hight buildings
around my QTH here. I am sure, it decrease its ERP significantly.
If I have more better TX QTH, than I will can think about increase my
power from 120W to ???W. There is old factory near my QTH. I
discussed with the director about using a high factory chimney for my
VFL purposes. I am waiting for his answer. It is half to half.
73!
Lubos, OK2BVG
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 23:11:04 +0200
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: OK2BVG-DK7FC
Hello Lubos,
Am 04.04.2011 19:20, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG:
I hope to see your signal soon. I built a new modification of
your VLF active antenna, so it would be the good opportunity for
testing this one.
But for test purposes it is better to have a weak signal, just above
the noise ;-) But i know you are monitoring in DFCW-3...
So, what do you plan next Lubos? QRO to 500 W? This would allow you to
produce a signal visible in TF i think. And you will be visible in even
worse conds. Or your signal will be visible during the night period
which allows you to send a full callsign or such funny things ;-) Any
plans?
73, Stefan
73!
Lubos, OK2BVG
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 16:03:06 +0200
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: OK2BVG-DK7FC
Text zpr�vy
Hello Lubos,
Congratulations! This is your first clear trace on my grabber in 6000 /
424 uHz. First i thought it is OE5ODL but there is no trace on his
grabber but a strong trace on OE3GHBs grabber. And if you are sure
about the TX frequency, it must be your signal. Very fine, 600 km ( http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=JN49IK&from=jn88ks
), my first OK
RX contact :-)
Best 73 and QRO ;-)
Stefan/DK7FC
PS: Maybe we can have a "K" now once again? It is a better ID than a
long dash...
Am 04.04.2011 13:49, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG:
Hello
Eddie!
It would be my signal. We will see, but it seems to be promissing!
The conditions are good, so I will transmit until 12:00UT.
My PC is disciplined by WaG generator PS30 (10kHz). See my signal on
the Stefan�s grabber in DFCW6000 window.
The frequency is correct: 8970.034Hz
My new PA 120W running on its full power. It is doing its best :-) !
73!
Lubos, OK2BVG
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:30:17 +0100
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: 110404_OK2BVG
Hi Lubos
I am pretty sure we have here. I make your frequency 8.970034kHz. We
will not get excited yet :-)
How stable is your signal, it seems possibly not stable enough for QRSS
60000 to help.
Continued operation after 11.00 UTC would help identification.
73 Eddie G3ZJO
On 03/04/2011 20:32, Lubos OK2BVG wrote:
Hello
OMs!
I will be
testing my VLF PA 120W tomorrow:
Date: 04.04.2011
Time: 07:00 UT
- 11:00 UT
Antenna: Marconi L
24m up + 220m top load
PA: 120W
Identification: long
carrier only
Mode:
FRQ: 8970.040
(+/- some few mHz :-)
Shift:
I hope, the
conditions will be good :-)
73!
Lubos,
OK2BVG
|
|
