Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

LF: Re: CQ WW

from [James Moritz] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: CQ WW
From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:58:24 -0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1297598298; bh=3A0bokG4DIpBuzb+nuor7bCqTOjdZ3t7F4Syqm4ptf8=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=G5EVETXxeccC9wUoPbHGLxf3rFUO20PleWp/Ecocsz047zqmC5uwvTsUYVuPwQh9aqp2Qkn9uuBbQxp26EBcmC+NiD5VAnHkqp1EM69bCSHDwjNqBelESmbu0+YQSMxsKZBKwhmJ6L1GANggWSswU8DZ+S1xutD4gtlnmwjYxb4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=jExSu2Th3Vl8si5TmYMD5NBXmgD/OuVavmfFhBOU2BWhRtau7nY3HgXN9xCAbcqrEXncNuIr262BIGo9AaOMqFGRin2Psw4wzHE6jlkPrvAF8OQIOF5BaZxaS8E/sUWVYlELY2KuASJnQvCm72QqU4ecYM9BBphNYbpqWTzYG6Q= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <002d01cbcb72$87e2f760$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <00c301cbcb04$b57989a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><[email protected]><00dd01cbcb0a$b7f1f4f0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><[email protected]><00eb01cbcb0d$6a82ee10$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <012001cbcb15$e63c14c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <433CFC410770450186BB307A8AD28484@JimPC> <002d01cbcb72$87e2f760$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected] 

Dear Mal, LF Group,
Yes, I'm still active on 136k. Re-locating my shack has taken rather longer than I hoped, but it is more or less in usable condition now. 


The freq area 136.177 seems to be a problem in the USA from QRM, maybe the
old freq of 136.318 would be better and why was it changed?
At this location, 136.177kHz seems to be a better frequency for reception of Eu stations due to lower sideband QRM from HGA22. You would have to ask the VE and W stations what it is like on the other side of the Atlantic. 

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: Re: Re: Re: CQ WW, James Moritz
Next by Date:  LF: Re: Re: Re: CQ WW, jrusgrove
Previous by Thread:  LF: Re: Re: CQ WW, mal hamilton
Next by Thread:  LF: Re: Re: Re: CQ WW, jrusgrove
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]