Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: Re: CQ WW

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: CQ WW
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 07:54:43 -0500
References: <00c301cbcb04$b57989a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><[email protected]><00dd01cbcb0a$b7f1f4f0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><[email protected]><00eb01cbcb0d$6a82ee10$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <012001cbcb15$e63c14c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <433CFC410770450186BB307A8AD28484@JimPC> <002d01cbcb72$87e2f760$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Mal

Was preoccupied last night and thought I had switched on the temporary grabber but apparently not ...

AFAIK the window was moved from 136318 to 136177 to accommodate VE7TIL and a noise problem he has at 318. Unfortunately the move hasn't worked out well for me. For years 318 has been a clear spot at this location and provided some amazing T/A receptions - like CT1DRP copied 1-1/2 hours before local sunset. At 177 extraneous signals are the norm more often than not and I've given up regular T/A watching because of it. It's the odd time that interference isn't present.

The two attachments (if they make it through) show the difference at this 
location.

Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2

Attachment: 136177.jpg
Description: JPEG image

Attachment: 136318.jpg
Description: JPEG image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>