To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Re: Re: CQ WW |
From: | <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 13 Feb 2011 07:54:43 -0500 |
References: | <00c301cbcb04$b57989a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><[email protected]><00dd01cbcb0a$b7f1f4f0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><[email protected]><00eb01cbcb0d$6a82ee10$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <012001cbcb15$e63c14c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <433CFC410770450186BB307A8AD28484@JimPC> <002d01cbcb72$87e2f760$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
MalWas preoccupied last night and thought I had switched on the temporary grabber but apparently not ... AFAIK the window was moved from 136318 to 136177 to accommodate VE7TIL and a noise problem he has at 318. Unfortunately the move hasn't worked out well for me. For years 318 has been a clear spot at this location and provided some amazing T/A receptions - like CT1DRP copied 1-1/2 hours before local sunset. At 177 extraneous signals are the norm more often than not and I've given up regular T/A watching because of it. It's the odd time that interference isn't present. The two attachments (if they make it through) show the difference at this location.Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
136177.jpg
136318.jpg |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: CQ WW, James Moritz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: how to get ground rod ressitance low, John Rabson |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: CQ WW, James Moritz |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: CQ WW, mal hamilton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |