Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: CQ WW |
| From: | <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:53:07 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <00c301cbcb04$b57989a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <00dd01cbcb0a$b7f1f4f0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <00eb01cbcb0d$6a82ee10$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <012001cbcb15$e63c14c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <433CFC410770450186BB307A8AD28484@JimPC> <002d01cbcb72$87e2f760$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <001101cbcb7d$2fbc4810$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <004001cbcb86$5239b180$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
the constant chatter (from Mal) on the reflector about when to stop transmitting and send report doesn't really seem like a valid attempt at a QSO to me. It's not. The rules for a valid QSO have been well-established within the VHF/eme/meteor-scatter world that once a sked has begun, any communications outside of the sked invalidates the attempt and it must be restarted. Seems some have forgotten this very basic concept. WEB - "The VE7SL Radio Notebook": http://members.shaw.ca/ve7sl |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: WPF 13-02.jpg, henny van elst |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: X-ray Solar Flare, Lubos OK2BVG |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: CQ WW, Scott Tilley |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: CQ WW, mal hamilton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |