To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Units (was Re: JA GRRABBERS (sic) at a same time) |
From: | John Rabson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:45:20 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <85CEACD8BCC84EF68F30F843720D1B93@JimPC> |
References: | <002801cbadf3$1e15bb70$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <1294359648.6336.6.camel@vaio3rd> <001501cbae53$54fee2a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> ,<001f01cbae5c$01cc94c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C88715AE9FD@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> <[email protected]> <1294405086.5826.11.camel@pat-compaq-evo> <[email protected]> <85CEACD8BCC84EF68F30F843720D1B93@JimPC> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
LF, 50 years ago, I went to Reading University to learn about physics and chemistry. Our physics lectures were all done with CGS units. One of the professors went through Dimensional Analysis very thoroughly, but when I asked why capacitance had two different values depending on whether we were in the magnetic or electrostatic mode he got very shirty. In our standard textbook (written of course by him) he refused even to mention MKS although it was already coming into use. My roommate was in a worse state. He had of course had a normal English education in feet and inches but had done physics in MKS. He could not understand why he had to learn these two new systems which both went under the name of CGS. He got a First anyway. John F5VLF |
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: JA GRRABBERS (sic) at a same time, James Moritz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: JA GRRABBERS at a same time, John Rabson |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: JA GRRABBERS (sic) at a same time, James Moritz |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: JA GRRABBERS (sic) at a same time, Roger Lapthorn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |