To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: OT End of the BBC World Service on Shortwave |
From: | Chris Trayner <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:55:17 +0000 |
Accept-language: | en-US, en-GB |
Acceptlanguage: | en-US, en-GB |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thread-index: | AcvBcAVwDWYNyfasQ16D71gPqnjl5Q== |
Thread-topic: | LF: OT End of the BBC World Service on Shortwave |
On 31 Jan 2011, at 10:20, M0FMT wrote: However the BBC world service, the Government mouth-piece, is currently funded by direct taxation which is probable more equitable than the new plan which is to fund it out of the compulsory so called Licence Fee, collected under threat of imprisonment, which is really a tax on a tax i.e. paid out of taxed income. This is the dark side of English culture. Commercial radio and TV are arguably as bad or worse. They are paid for by advertising; the firms which advertise get their advert money from selling products. So if you buy products which are advertised you are presumably subsidising many commercial channels which you don't watch, many indeed outside your area. You can choose not to have a TV and licence, but you can't realistically chose not to buy these products. But, really, do any of us care? The BBC Licence Fee is probably less than 1% of your post-tax income. 73, Chris G4OKW |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: OT End of the BBC World Service on Shortwave, Jurgen Bartels |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: OT End of the BBC World Service on Shortwave, M0FMT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: OT End of the BBC World Service on Shortwave, Jacek Lipkowski |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: OT End of the BBC World Service on Shortwave, g4gvw |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |