Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today |
| From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:14:19 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1287778463; bh=dXoL88MNd5yjTV440jqJwO0+Qay2gzEFQdpHwjRcBVg=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=BvsVUkfWADSa9Dj5pvgCYYANVBQBJ6jUJC5lT6McYqmltB6VvHC/DttUVvX+EhQpU6Jr+dCvdH042pIcXYa1jmAIF1KVe4q+Nv8yA4xG7YeXeqcqmPYTRKFhPn15HlDeMvg1k+uE0M0EhKp+ken42ly0VWYIFGrYiUoqotGHq+g= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=F44sj38Jo56R+THALr5iz80iuBM7xPBp/Q6mtbwI1xhlRn0HTIuPUZy7O5rRaxLWXYVXeW266eM2X792IYHzdu10HzF7S7ZPFU4EiBYbYT4GytASavJFixbGOjX0y0XY6by+RPWwSByfcOh0UEYq3qX4E/u+cfRzGtTe+kdFxdw= ; |
| Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
No a good idea Jacek Ofcoms regulatory powers do not end at 9kHz. They have powers over radiation at any frequency. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacek Lipkowski" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 8:45 PM Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > > > *Frequencies allowed:* 8.7kHz - 9.1kHz > > i wonder what would happen if you applied specifically for 8.0-8.990kHz > (no frequency >9kHz). is expanding the frequency range above 9kHz a trick > by OFCOM, so that they can show that they have juristiction? > > VY 73 > > Jacek / SQ5BPF > > |
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today, Graham |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today, gm4slv |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today, Graham |
| Next by Thread: | RE: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today, victor13 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |