To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today |
From: | "Graham" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:52:51 +0100 |
Importance: | Normal |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
.... not a good idea , taken long enough as it is ! at least cannot blame Roger for a glitch in sub navigation ! -------------------------------------------------- From: "Jacek Lipkowski" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 8:45 PM To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Roger Lapthorn wrote:*Frequencies allowed:* 8.7kHz - 9.1kHzi wonder what would happen if you applied specifically for 8.0-8.990kHz (no frequency >9kHz). is expanding the frequency range above 9kHz a trick by OFCOM, so that they can show that they have juristiction?VY 73 Jacek / SQ5BPF |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today, Jacek Lipkowski |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today, Alan Melia |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today, Jacek Lipkowski |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today, Alan Melia |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |