To: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today |
From: | Jacek Lipkowski <sq5bpf@lipkowski.org> |
Date: | Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:45:04 +0200 (CEST) |
In-reply-to: | <AANLkTi=0yvhBnUN6b=45TPrPv=GvDsRbWMJ=Awae4MBS@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <AANLkTi=0yvhBnUN6b=45TPrPv=GvDsRbWMJ=Awae4MBS@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Sender: | owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Roger Lapthorn wrote: *Frequencies allowed:* 8.7kHz - 9.1kHz i wonder what would happen if you applied specifically for 8.0-8.990kHz (no frequency >9kHz). is expanding the frequency range above 9kHz a trick by OFCOM, so that they can show that they have juristiction? VY 73 Jacek / SQ5BPF |
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Re: DI2AK beacon operating from DK 8 ND, rn3agc |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today, Graham |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today, Graham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |