Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: PA0RDT miniwhip in TX?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: PA0RDT miniwhip in TX?
From: Steve Sykes <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:15:06 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (added by [email protected])
References: <000c01cb5a7a$44cfcc50$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <1285185012.2042.23.camel@gerhard-desktop> <[email protected]> (added by [email protected])
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4
There is also a possibility that diodes used like this will cause IMD when used near a strong RF Field.  I agree with Roelof, don't try to fix a problem that isn't there.  I have used the antenna less than 5 feet away from a 150 watt HF data transmitter without issue.  The U310 is a very good device.

Steve KD2OM/NNN0HSB
On 9/22/2010 4:34 PM, Marco IK1ODO wrote:
Hello Gerhard,

the 100n capacitor will do nothing, it is in series with the input pad capacitance (a few pF).
The diodes will clamp at 0.6 V, that is too low (every static "crack" will send the diodes in conduction) and limits the dynamic range.
More, they will add capacity (2 pF each?) at the very critical point of the amplifier input, decreasing the gain.
I think I will leave the gate alone, as in the original design.

Possibly the idea of a small reed relay to be closed in TX may be better; those have very low C. But I will do that only after the ninth burnt J310 - they are so cheap from Roelof :-) (just jocking, of course, I could not resist)

73 - Marco IK1ODO

No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3152 - Release Date: 09/22/10 02:34:00

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>