To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: move from loop to loaded aerial |
From: | "Wolf Ostwald" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:36:36 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C3A@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
References: | <[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]> <53EF46B489244A09B02F194D6CD79DAB@df2py> <[email protected]> <3E76E4DCF3684D3E99582E065CA7486E@df2py> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C39@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <5E86B9622E084C7AABBED3AA4DF93ABF@df2py> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C3A@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thread-index: | AcsIKGjKsK5UVdcJTRaNiexvv3fsSgALocogABnAVncABD9bsAABmvf+ACDjGyA= |
Hello group ! After all the efforts, with a reasonable large loop, seem to be to no avail, I am going to move to a loaded radiator. Either vertical or longwire. A radiator with a relatively small active length should more or less have a spherical pattern. Hence the geometrical orientation, may it be vertical or horizontal, should not have a big effect on the spherical pattern. Is this assumption rite or not ? A horizontal span could be easier be longer than a vertical one. I am not talking about a large structure like Stefan`s kite, I am talking about a more "average ham`s "-antenna like a 25m vertical, which can stay put for frequent testing and experiments. Any ideas about this ? 73 de wolf <<attachment: winmail.dat>> |
Previous by Date: | LF: AW: DLVLF with QSY to 8972, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Sunday July 4 ,“Alexanderson Day”, at 09:00 UTC and 12:00 UTC. , F4DTL |
Previous by Thread: | LF: AW: DLVLF with QSY to 8972, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | LF: RE: move from loop to loaded aerial, James Cowburn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |