Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: AW: RE: move from loop to loaded aerial |
| From: | "Wolf Ostwald" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:38:05 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <008901cb0961$23480030$0217aac0@desktop> |
| References: | <[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]> <53EF46B489244A09B02F194D6CD79DAB@df2py> <[email protected]> <3E76E4DCF3684D3E99582E065CA7486E@df2py> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C39@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <5E86B9622E084C7AABBED3AA4DF93ABF@df2py> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C3A@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <AE037EB9BC4D4F4E995A0E036AA7CC6D@df2py> <008901cb0961$23480030$0217aac0@desktop> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| Thread-index: | AcsIKGjKsK5UVdcJTRaNiexvv3fsSgALocogABnAVncABD9bsAABmvf+ACDjGyAAAgThsAAAVEUg |
Hi Jim ! Thanks for the info. I already have the antenna structure. I either use a toploaded vertical abt 25 m high, or I load a long wire same height but much larger. My question is whether the performance will be the same or not. I guess as there is no such thing as a free lunch in physics, the vertical will be the superior performer. Then I have to calculate the antenna`s capacity to get the inductivity rite. 73 de wolf <<attachment: winmail.dat>> |
| Previous by Date: | LF: RE: move from loop to loaded aerial, James Cowburn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: RE: move from loop to loaded aerial, Mike-WE0H |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: move from loop to loaded aerial, James Cowburn |
| Next by Thread: | LF: RE: move from loop to loaded aerial, Mike-WE0H |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |