To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: AW: DLVLF qrv again |
From: | Mike-WE0H <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 12 Jun 2010 03:06:20 -0500 |
In-reply-to: | <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C41@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
References: | <[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]> <5E86B9622E084C7AABBED3AA4DF93ABF@df2py> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C3A@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <AE037EB9BC4D4F4E995A0E036AA7CC6D@df2py> <008901cb0961$23480030$0217aac0@desktop> <CB94EC47D6E9411E86C053122D4BEE1A@df2py> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C3B@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <4F1FCFEDFEBB40719E4D9FE7150B6102@df2py> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C3C@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <2E40942B0BF542AE94EE305B8EB155B6@df! ! 2py> <38A51B74B884D 74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C3D@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <DEBE3727B00442D3BAA5CFC5FCC5040A@df2py> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C40@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <003101cb09fe$cf0fbf50$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C41@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt. de> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) |
I see a strong signal at 8.9703kc right now on Stefan's Grabber. Is Wolf a little off frequency or just trying something different to see if it is a valid signal? OK off to bed...GN guys. Mike WE0H Stefan S wrote: Mal,Impossible! ...unless Wolf runs not at least 10 MW!It makes no sense to watch the QRG faster than QRSS-600, belive me!Stefan |
Previous by Date: | LF: AW: HV-Transformer experiment on 9kc, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: AW: testing 8970.2 now, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | LF: AW: Re: AW: DLVLF qrv again, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | LF: AW: Re: AW: DLVLF qrv again, Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |