To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Why is this group not a Yahoo group with archives and web access? |
From: | Alberto di Bene <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:02:30 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Z-usanet-msgid: | XID562ocgRch2672X39 |
On 3/7/2010 4:47 PM, Roger Lapthorn wrote: Thanks for all the responses on this. Some decent reasons have been given to leave things just as they are, so I'm OK with that. Maybe just a little change could be done...the current size limit for attachments seems to be perhaps a bit restrictive... increasing it up to 60 - 70 kB could be useful, and at the same it will still continue to be a deterrent for not clogging the inboxes with oversize messages... 73 Alberto I2PHD |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 8.97 kHz Grabber online (9 kHz line), Mike.WE0H |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 8.97 kHz Grabber online (9 kHz line), rn3agc |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Why is this group not a Yahoo group with archives and web access?, Roger Lapthorn |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Why is this group not a Yahoo group with archives and web access?, ALAN MELIA |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |