To: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Why is this group not a Yahoo group with archives and web access? |
From: | Paul Nicholson <vlf0308@abelian.org> |
Date: | Sun, 07 Mar 2010 06:48:47 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <9afca2641003061120o7d50442ax1348688d91fa3c04@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <9afca2641003061120o7d50442ax1348688d91fa3c04@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Sender: | owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) |
Roger Lapthorn wrote: > it would be much better if it was a Yahoo Group. It can often take a long time - several hours, for a message to come through a Yahoo group. Useless for activity alerts. Sometimes messages are lost completely, or appear in the group archives but are not received by email. > All messages are archived and can be searched easily, even > years later Maybe, so long as Yahoo continue the service. There's nothing to stop them pulling the plug on a group - or all groups for that matter, if business policy changes. One of the nice things about joining the LF list is to find a simple no-nonsense email reflector with a short reliable round-trip time - so refreshing compared with the Yahoo monster clunky too-full-of-features unreliable group server. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | LF: 136.319 kHz, Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 12 km on Dream(ers) Band, Alexander S. Yurkov |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Why is this group not a Yahoo group with archives and web access?, Graham |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Why is this group not a Yahoo group with archives and web access?, ALAN MELIA |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |