To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Results of optimising an active antenna |
From: | "John RABSON" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:18:20 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AAF4@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]> <op.u4bnzwomyzqh0k@pc1> <[email protected]> <op.u4de9ajwyzqh0k@pc1> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On 04/12/2009 at 12:44 Alberto di Bene wrote: >Correct... so to reduce the variance, what would be needed is a much >greater number >of samples so to average out the statistical fluctuations... hmmm, not too >bad a task... :-) > >73 Alberto I2PHD And several participants, so as to cancel observer effects. Perhaps schedule tests for RSGB convention or Bodenseetreffen? 73 John F5VLF |
Previous by Date: | LF: DI2AG WSPR daylight, Walter und Marianne Staubach |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: WSPR on 137 kHz, Gus |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Results of optimising an active antenna, Alberto di Bene |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Results of optimising an active antenna, Gary - G4WGT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |