Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: reducing common-mode noise |
| From: | Peter Dodd <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:28:28 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <op.u4c2o2cgyzqh0k@pc1> |
| References: | <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AAF4@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <op.u4bl2mt4yzqh0k@pc1> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <op.u4c2o2cgyzqh0k@pc1> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
Hello Roelof,I used a similar one for a multiband dipole for the upper HF frequency bands but I don't think they would work for LF. Regards Peter, G3LDO Have you also been looking into the performance of bifiliar wound common mode chokes, e.g. 15 turns on the popular FT-37-43 Amidon ferrite toroid?These come in handy for receiver applications. |
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Re: WSPR on 137 kHz, Gus |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: 500kHz RTTY, Rik Strobbe |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: LF, reducing common-mode noise, Roelof Bakker |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: reducing common-mode noise, Roelof Bakker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |