To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: wspr |
From: | "Graham" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 2 Sep 2009 19:54:17 +0100 |
Importance: | Normal |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <005601ca2b2f$f97ee260$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <[email protected]> <008601ca2b38$eaff8e20$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
You just could not make it up ! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqsT4xnKZPg G . -------------------------------------------------- From: "John RABSON" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 9:47 PM To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: LF: wspr On 01/09/2009 at 20:17 mal hamilton wrote:Roger I am stating the facts, someone else mentioned seeing the signals on the waterfall but they were not decoding. I could easlily have made a qso on cw given the strength of signals whereas WSPR was not decoding, so the exercise is pointless.That was me. I wasn't decoding because I don't yet have a decoder. Had I had one, and given the snr I observed, I would have expected 100% copy. On the few occasions I have heard Mal, his snr has not been anything like as good as WSPR.John F5VLF No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.75/2341 - Release Date: 09/02/09 05:50:00 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: AGC beacon, Andrey rn3agc |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: wspr, Andy Talbot |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: wspr, John RABSON |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: wspr, Andy Talbot |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |