Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: wspr

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: wspr
From: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 19:54:17 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <005601ca2b2f$f97ee260$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <[email protected]> <008601ca2b38$eaff8e20$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

You just could not make it up !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqsT4xnKZPg

G .

--------------------------------------------------
From: "John RABSON" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 9:47 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: wspr


On 01/09/2009 at 20:17 mal hamilton wrote:

Roger I am stating the facts, someone else mentioned seeing the signals
on the waterfall but they were not decoding. I could easlily have made a
qso on cw given the strength of signals whereas WSPR was not decoding, so
the exercise is pointless.

That was me. I wasn't decoding because I don't yet have a decoder. Had I had one, and given the snr I observed, I would have expected 100% copy. On the few occasions I have heard Mal, his snr has not been anything like as good as WSPR.

John F5VLF








No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.75/2341 - Release Date: 09/02/09 05:50:00





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>