Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: wspr

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: wspr
From: "John RABSON" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:47:34 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
On 01/09/2009 at 20:17 mal hamilton wrote:

>Roger I am stating the facts, someone else mentioned seeing the signals
>on the waterfall but they were not decoding. I could easlily have made a
>qso on cw given the strength of signals whereas WSPR was not decoding, so
>the exercise is pointless.

That was me.  I wasn't decoding because I don't yet have a decoder.  Had I had 
one, and given the snr I observed, I would have expected 100% copy.  On the few 
occasions I have heard Mal, his snr has not been anything like as good as WSPR.

John F5VLF

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>