To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: wspr |
From: | "John RABSON" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:47:34 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <008601ca2b38$eaff8e20$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> |
References: | <005601ca2b2f$f97ee260$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <[email protected]> <008601ca2b38$eaff8e20$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On 01/09/2009 at 20:17 mal hamilton wrote: >Roger I am stating the facts, someone else mentioned seeing the signals >on the waterfall but they were not decoding. I could easlily have made a >qso on cw given the strength of signals whereas WSPR was not decoding, so >the exercise is pointless. That was me. I wasn't decoding because I don't yet have a decoder. Had I had one, and given the snr I observed, I would have expected 100% copy. On the few occasions I have heard Mal, his snr has not been anything like as good as WSPR. John F5VLF |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: wspr, Roger Lapthorn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: AGC beacon, Laurence BY3A-KL1X China |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: wspr, Roger Lapthorn |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: wspr, mal hamilton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |