On 01/09/2009 at 20:17 mal hamilton wrote:
>Roger I am stating the facts, someone else mentioned seeing the signals
>on the waterfall but they were not decoding. I could easlily have made a
>qso on cw given the strength of signals whereas WSPR was not decoding, so
>the exercise is pointless.
That was me. I wasn't decoding because I don't yet have a decoder. Had I had
one, and given the snr I observed, I would have expected 100% copy. On the few
occasions I have heard Mal, his snr has not been anything like as good as WSPR.