Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: wspr

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: wspr
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:44:19 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QqaB6iFIJ7dxQQb/JDbN5EYjOSRnxmFi17TDvgOmD4c=; b=bDkYXU3+JEjOKRP8Sj4bWVV34L4XRBFDoLPtG23EAD8xs6EHraMfxdHULor1Y4PtGJ qy/K6EHEHwFJNBGmole38i8SyYoZt7diIfJo06HkbTdv9sTRYe4PeofV7eLLfv3S8FDq BBZM03M585dFsi0YN6r8jf5VZ/a2KJCCNHv/M=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=L4ILHNZwrVxGkZFza8/wHwetN96zU/N+u91FidonPSt/zsPmbnTITMWANZwDjbsKdL n1kNnZJ0X6Uc4IAqEVQuO602u1xCSQmDBibIRFOUMpIEqj9b7ncjhWcYaw4VLGWjY1xQ zaH/0luGhdh4BimZIAm4uijJ8pW7M455J4y+c=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
These are very impressive results Mal - well done. I expect you've put a great deal of work in optimising your station and antennas over the years and we all could learn a good deal from your experience.  I have a LOT to learn at this end of the spectrum, but that is half the fun.

Best regards

2009/9/2 mal hamilton <[email protected]>
I was getting 579 from BOSTON/USA from NC1K on 137 khz over the years on CW which I thought was good using simple equipment like a manual morse key, home built mosfet class D TX/PA and an inv L antenna, also regular QSO'S with Russian stations. I am able to do the same on 500 KCS. I am surprised you have difficulty with my signal, I expect the problem is your end.
NC1K was a professional CW operator (Radio Officer) unfortunately now silent key.
de G3KEV

----- Original Message ----- From: "John RABSON" <[email protected]>

To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: LF: wspr

On 01/09/2009 at 20:17 mal hamilton wrote:

Roger I am stating the facts, someone else mentioned seeing the signals
on the waterfall but they were not decoding. I could easlily have made a
qso on cw given the strength of signals whereas WSPR was not decoding, so
the exercise is pointless.

That was me.  I wasn't decoding because I don't yet have a decoder.  Had I had one, and given the snr I observed, I would have expected 100% copy.  On the few occasions I have heard Mal, his snr has not been anything like as good as WSPR.

John F5VLF


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG -
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.74/2339 - Release Date: 09/01/09 06:52:00

G3XBM    GQRP 1678      ISWL G11088
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>