Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Re: wspr

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: wspr
From: "Johan H. Bodin" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:31:19 +0200
In-reply-to: <006c01ca2b34$1446abb0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
References: <005601ca2b2f$f97ee260$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <EC76840964DD4A818D35DD906979B23B@MaynePC> <006c01ca2b34$1446abb0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
mal hamilton wrote:
> Maybe u like FICTION I like FACTS

Mal, please have a look at the FACTS at:

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shannon-Hartley_theorem

These are the "rules" that all kinds of communications have to obey to
when information is sent through a noisy channel. Believe me, hand sent
CW is no exception!

I agree with you that CW is both fun and efficient, I am a keen CW
operator myself by the way (QRP HF), but, by today's standards, CW is
simply not the most efficient way to communicate.


73
Johan SM6LKM


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>