Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: wspr

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: wspr
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:10:22 +0100
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
I was getting 579 from BOSTON/USA from NC1K on 137 khz over the years on CW
which I thought was good using simple equipment like a manual morse key,
home built mosfet class D TX/PA and an inv L antenna, also regular QSO'S
with Russian stations. I am able to do the same on 500 KCS. I am surprised
you have difficulty with my signal, I expect the problem is your end.
NC1K was a professional CW operator (Radio Officer) unfortunately now silent
de G3KEV

----- Original Message ----- From: "John RABSON" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: LF: wspr

On 01/09/2009 at 20:17 mal hamilton wrote:

Roger I am stating the facts, someone else mentioned seeing the signals
on the waterfall but they were not decoding. I could easlily have made a
qso on cw given the strength of signals whereas WSPR was not decoding, so
the exercise is pointless.
That was me. I wasn't decoding because I don't yet have a decoder. Had I
had one, and given the snr I observed, I would have expected 100% copy. On
the few occasions I have heard Mal, his snr has not been anything like as
good as WSPR.
John F5VLF


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG -
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.74/2339 - Release Date: 09/01/09 06:52:00

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>