Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: wspr

from [Roger Lapthorn] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: wspr
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:26:52 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=coTrWS6mKEBEp7GSOb10UTbklExpZ34rk+55rcL62v8=; b=hPyP4MRY8KXyHzcTIndbQmS4f5yCvh+Qf+zNlyDqXUfHu+i+ELC910Ph+o80o2pRS6 RfrDf/MnbNJ6lyvtpYz6rDQoANqjzqFK3C0FF6pzE5v7BjWqZui/Tj506ikcGDS6m8WX 86630Bo/v5Kn3aiV6FmK25Abf5k9aZuOhZFT8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=dG20Ib1OUK+4a1HUcN6i7Lo+VpL23QEi2BBLb0hsLYqyfYZTSL3y798raozl3P1nfo cfpLqpp1hkZANYeRdqQKtEi6kBridzYRxX3V7k6Zxl4df1ww5kCAmXvISYLzFGXcd/Je eI/ZIzS7qOMMWCyfYCCfrijtDL4+acysmzrlY=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <008601ca2b38$eaff8e20$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
References: <005601ca2b2f$f97ee260$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <[email protected]> <008601ca2b38$eaff8e20$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Yes, looking forward to a CW QSO Mal when I've got the TX together and a half decent antenna. On the digital stuff we can agree to disagree.

All the best

Roger
G3XBM



2009/9/1 mal hamilton <[email protected]>
Roger I am stating the facts, someone else mentioned seeing the signals on the waterfall but they were not decoding. I could easlily have made a qso on cw given the strength of signals whereas WSPR was not decoding, so the exercise is pointless.
Get active on LF/MF transmitting and try the various modes then let me have your opinion. We could have a qso on CW while WSPR is warming up!!!!!!!!
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: LF: wspr

Mal,

Not helpful and factually incorrect.

73s
Roger



2009/9/1 mal hamilton <[email protected]>
All WSPR signals last evening struggling in QRN/QRS whereas they were audible here and if in CW mode I could easily have made a real time QSO.
decode was marginal, and then the same old repetive rubbish.
g3kev
 
  



--
-------------------------------------------------------------
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
G3XBM    GQRP 1678      ISWL G11088


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.74/2339 - Release Date: 09/01/09 06:52:00



--
-------------------------------------------------------------
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
G3XBM    GQRP 1678      ISWL G11088
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: Re: wspr, James Moritz
Next by Date:  Re: LF: wspr, John RABSON
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: wspr, mal hamilton
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: wspr, John RABSON
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]