Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX

from [Roger Lapthorn] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:11:17 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MvEIt/W3uq6xH1PvSO07x8ydaX9m61GOVXvRa9pSWvA=; b=RJMnxnfSjjtLLWnXfJny21IMyTdTx3jLdINUP43QhK26AASUSujtEBHFu4IL5qsezD suPl8eb5EDJ0oiJZNfgcyIOvVoktsZbgvegfgyoGxdbHSSMOhuHldJEfGSQdNf9rJZcc 4kZL3/p46hxJr0Ti/7tZIia5513Tl1nMyUTwo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=sW8SlTiZsdDvV98X1V8r6DVJWWB1hzQ7eZF9LxSSV4NyfTwTl7lP2esNkrLOWsf9X9 M+CAXbM1TIXtsBNNi2WSQX00OvIf2KV2Pb/gtS3COjyQnHJqT2P3H7RELI7uADSRM6oC UzsecMR2NMlq8SEMjcPAEUPsusXCrHk6zvq9Y=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <003b01ca3248$087945c0$0217aac0@jimdesk> <95D6CD79FCB744348737942B4BC8E855@JimPC> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Well, easy for some (I can see) but NOT for me. What am I doing wrong?

19:19:11 >WOLF RESTARTED
t:  24 f: 0.367 a:-0.5 dp: 85.8 ci: 1 cj:  0 1STCG6J2X7EUEWZ ?
t:  48 f: 0.366 a:-0.4 dp: 85.7 ci: 2 cj:  0 VP*JV9IX47R60ZC ?
t:  96 f: 0.365 a:-0.3 dp: 85.3 ci: 6 cj:310 K.RU24.Q9AE21FZ ?
t: 192 f: 0.391 pm:10.86 jm:135 q:-11.5 -9.4 FOFTI.6ISF EOGB ?
t: 288 f:-0.400 pm:14.10 jm:255 q:-10.7 -5.7 ABMR90MGQ54T6P/ ?
t: 384 f:-0.078 pm:14.23 jm:  1 q:-10.2 -7.8 P.7DUMD3EHD/94S ?
t: 480 f: 0.186 pm:15.66 jm:852 q: -9.2 -7.8 S0MISIL2.5URQJ. ?
t: 576 f:-0.195 pm:17.73 jm:416 q: -9.0 -7.7 .ZV01QUR4??? DB ?
t: 672 f: 0.762 pm:18.85 jm: 74 q:-10.3 -7.7 KFKN1G9 EPGXDN3 ?
t: 768 f: 0.342 pm:20.93 jm:135 q:-10.1 -7.6 ???HM.BKM56T4.9 ?
t: 864 f: 0.762 pm:22.51 jm: 74 q: -8.4 -9.2 R/92R8DJOHKK42J ?
t: 960 f: 0.332 pm:24.31 jm:159 q: -8.3 -7.2 I*/U 5EYP057LGS ?
t:1056 f: 0.332 pm:24.93 jm:159 q: -7.9 -8.0 8RZNALIB9XK GIA ?
t:1152 f: 0.332 pm:26.07 jm:159 q: -7.8 -7.8 *DNYG*DN0YZ 1ME ?
t:1248 f: 0.332 pm:28.64 jm:147 q: -7.1 -8.3 MW3YFN68VBY0754 ?
t:1344 f: 0.332 pm:29.74 jm:159 q: -6.7 -7.6 JBCAPMW.YV59S*/ ?
t:1440 f: 0.332 pm:30.10 jm:159 q: -6.5 -6.2 REO2D/Q82MGVTZ1 -
t:1536 f: 2.383 pm:30.67 jm:862 q: -5.3 -8.0 K*S.D71XBP*7M5J ?
t:1632 f: 0.332 pm:33.64 jm:874 q: -6.9 -7.5 /KC9V6702???CI3 ?
t:1728 f: 1.631 pm:37.36 jm:459 q: -5.2-10.2 S7VHN.7XBKFP V0 ?
t:1824 f: 0.332 pm:39.66 jm:874 q: -6.1 -8.1 DHGCVD9FG???.SW ?
t:1920 f: 0.332 pm:39.98 jm:874 q: -5.8 -7.1 FS ???D4QVDNMAQ ?
t:2016 f: 1.631 pm:40.76 jm:459 q: -4.7 -6.1 87H2914HR AMF8/ -
t:2112 f: 1.631 pm:41.33 jm:459 q: -4.7 -8.1 87H3EG0F3P6WS6X ?
t:2208 f: 0.254 pm:42.98 jm:415 q: -3.7 -7.7 TK0M 3TLTP/90XH ?
t:2304 f:-0.254 pm:44.74 jm:410 q: -3.8 -7.5 2MTQ .NSW5*1Q5S ?
t:2400 f:-0.254 pm:47.27 jm:410 q: -3.4 -8.6  .ZWBD1S1GFRZUO ?
t:2496 f:-0.254 pm:48.49 jm:410 q: -3.3 -8.7  .ZWBCC*RKD5.7/ ?
t:2592 f:-0.254 pm:49.53 jm:410 q: -3.0 -8.8  ./7EU2.D2ZS62G ?
t:2688 f:-0.254 pm:49.99 jm:410 q: -2.7 -6.0  ..1LCZAM77*5C9 -
t:2784 f: 0.303 pm:52.48 jm:467 q: -5.0 -8.7 4IVCSYMR1E*3R53 ?
t:2880 f: 0.303 pm:52.95 jm:467 q: -4.8 -5.9 4IVC27123T20NSC -
t:2976 f: 0.303 pm:53.97 jm:467 q: -4.7 -7.6 4IVDKPE86GVFAQT ?
...at which point I gave up.

And STILL no decode even though Jim is clear and strong on the waterfall.

73s
Roger G3XBM


2009/9/10 Piotr Młynarski <[email protected]>
James Moritz wrote:

Dear Jim, Roger, LF Group,

The M0BMU WOLF beacon is now running on 503.500kHz - I don't know what frequency G7NKS plans to be on , but would suggest about 100Hz spacing. If you are at reasonably close distance, and set up on the right receive frequency, you should be seeing a trace about 20Hz wide in the centre of the WOLF waterfall. However, for more distant stations, you can expect successful decodes even when there is no visible trace. It should be interesting to see how WOLF fares when trying to receive a weaker signal close to a stronger one.

Any reports will be very welcome.


Dear Jim, LF  Group,
Yesterday  evening/night i had all my rx  boxes off . I just read  the new posts on the reflector. among them,  it was an email from John , GM4SLV
John was saying it was too easy for him  to decode   WOLF  transmision from Jim. I  thought immediately it is going to be too difficult for me to do the same ..
but it was a nice surprise:
2009-09-10 19:36:31 >WOLF10  -r 11025 -f 1000 -t 3 -w 0.0000
t:  24 f:-2.129 a:-0.7 dp: 70.4 ci: 5 cj:257 27JXL*GCGV1KT0E ?
t:  48 f: 1.439 a: 0.1 dp: 70.4 ci:13 cj:290 5 CL/.XMV. Q7GO ?
t:  96 f:-0.322 a: 1.2 dp: 66.3 ci:11 cj: 46 X4*H4Y*08IQ/13X ?
t: 192 f: 0.303 pm:28.63 jm:286 q: -0.5 -1.2 M0BMU IO91VR 2W -
t: 288 f: 0.312 pm:32.73 jm:286 q:  2.5  2.1 M0BMU IO91VR 2W -
t: 384 f: 0.322 pm:45.78 jm:286 q:  2.0  2.2 M0BMU IO91VR 2W -
t: 480 f: 0.342 pm:62.10 jm:286 q: -0.3 -1.5 M0BMU IO91VR 2W -
t: 576 f: 0.342 pm:83.95 jm:286 q:  2.7  1.8 M0BMU IO91VR 2W -
t: 672 f: 0.342 pm:86.72 jm:286 q:  3.4  2.6 M0BMU IO91VR 2W -
t: 768 f: 0.361 pm:103.4 jm:287 q:  2.6  1.9 M0BMU IO91VR 2W -
t: 864 f: 0.371 pm:116.4 jm:287 q:  3.2  0.9 M0BMU IO91VR 2W -
t: 960 f: 0.371 pm:125.2 jm:287 q:  5.3  3.5 M0BMU IO91VR 2W -
t:1056 f: 0.381 pm:148.5 jm:287 q:  4.4  4.3 M0BMU IO91VR 2W -
t:1152 f: 0.381 pm:151.3 jm:287 q:  5.9  5.7 M0BMU IO91VR 2W -
t:1248 f: 0.381 pm:152.7 jm:287 q:  6.2  6.0 M0BMU IO91VR 2W -

                                       73 de peter, sq7mpj

qth: Lodz /jo91rs/






--
-------------------------------------------------------------
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
G3XBM    GQRP 1678      ISWL G11088
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX, Piotr Młynarski
Next by Date:  LF: Re: WOLF - ready to RX, Dave Sergeant
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX, Piotr Młynarski
Next by Thread:  LF: Re: WOLF - ready to RX, Dave Sergeant
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]