To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: WSPR |
From: | "dave.riley3" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:59:31 -0500 |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <731A4306CB8C49908C46445F7591EA6A@JimPC> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Am I on the right track.??.Short of downloading the WSPR software, this is what I see tonight near 503.500... SpectraVue http://www.radiocom.net/600M/WSPR503500.bmpAnd on ARGO QRSS3 a few hertz below 503.5 = http://www.radiocom.net/600M/WSPR00000.jpg Looks louder and cleaner on QRSS10 Lots of QRN tonight... Or is it just a birdy?? TNX Dave @ WD2XSH/17 ( in the colonies )----- Original Message ----- From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 6:50 PM Subject: Re: LF: WSPR Shouldn't they be marked as such by the program ? I have seen in the past some rows received by WSPR with the tag (bad msg)... but maybe it catches only some of the errors... |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR, James Moritz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: WSPR, James Moritz |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: WSPR, Graham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |