Re: LF: WSPR

["mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "dave.riley3" <dave.riley3@verizon.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR


> TNX G, guess it was a bogus sig that shows up here often...
>
> Also TU fer grabber url
If propagation remains as at presentr tonight is a good oppertunity for TR 
QSO'S
I will be QRV on 502.57 khz hopefully there will a few active from the USA.
Mal/g3kev

> Looks possibly good for tonight T/A with particle density @ 8.3 right 
> now??
> http://dx.qsl.net/propagation/propagation.html  Havn't figured this out
> yet...
>
> 73s from
>
> Dave
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 8:52 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: WSPR
>
>
> > I don't think there is any 500 activity to  night ?
> >
> > This grabber is a good indication !
> >
> > http://www.wireless.org.uk/grab/
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/uk500khz/web/500-khz-grabbers
> >
> > G ..
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "dave.riley3" <dave.riley3@verizon.net>
> > Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 12:59 AM
> > To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> > Subject: Re: LF: WSPR
> >
> > > Am I on the right track.??.
> > >
> > > Short of downloading the WSPR software, this is what I see tonight near
> > > 503.500...
> > >
> > > SpectraVue http://www.radiocom.net/600M/WSPR503500.bmp
> > >
> > > And on ARGO QRSS3 a few hertz below 503.5 =
> > > http://www.radiocom.net/600M/WSPR00000.jpg
> > >
> > > Looks louder and cleaner on QRSS10
> > >
> > > Lots of QRN tonight...
> > >
> > > Or is it just a birdy??
> > >
> > >
> > > TNX
> > >
> > > Dave @ WD2XSH/17  ( in the colonies )
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "James Moritz" <james.moritz@btopenworld.com>
> > > To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> > > Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 6:50 PM
> > > Subject: Re: LF: WSPR
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Shouldn't they be marked as such by the program ? I have seen in the
> > > > > past
> > > > > some rows
> > > > > received by WSPR with the tag (bad msg)...  but maybe it catches only
> > > > > some of the errors...
> >
> >
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> > > Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.5/1884 - Release Date: 
> > > 1/9/2009
> > > 08:38

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.5/1885 - Release Date: 1/9/2009 
7:59 PM