To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: WSPR |
From: | "Graham" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:52:18 -0000 |
Importance: | Normal |
In-reply-to: | <AFD72E60ACF148C2A1BAA824DFDE4F62@DR2> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <731A4306CB8C49908C46445F7591EA6A@JimPC> <AFD72E60ACF148C2A1BAA824DFDE4F62@DR2> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
I don't think there is any 500 activity to night ? This grabber is a good indication ! http://www.wireless.org.uk/grab/ http://groups.google.com/group/uk500khz/web/500-khz-grabbers G .. -------------------------------------------------- From: "dave.riley3" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 12:59 AM To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: LF: WSPR Am I on the right track.??. Short of downloading the WSPR software, this is what I see tonight near 503.500... SpectraVue http://www.radiocom.net/600M/WSPR503500.bmp And on ARGO QRSS3 a few hertz below 503.5 = http://www.radiocom.net/600M/WSPR00000.jpg Looks louder and cleaner on QRSS10 Lots of QRN tonight... Or is it just a birdy?? TNX Dave @ WD2XSH/17 ( in the colonies )----- Original Message ----- From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 6:50 PM Subject: Re: LF: WSPRShouldn't they be marked as such by the program ? I have seen in the pastsome rows received by WSPR with the tag (bad msg)... but maybe it catches only some of the errors... No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.comVersion: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.5/1884 - Release Date: 1/9/2009 08:38 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR, dave.riley3 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: XGJ, Lubos OK2BVG |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: WSPR, dave.riley3 |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: WSPR, dave.riley3 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |