A long piece of wire and an AUTO atu would do the job, and the right ATU
would handle as much power as you require.
Small active antennas and preamps although handy are not a patch on the real
thing. I know I have tried them all.
Plenty of DC/data enigneers about but RF experts scarce. Maybe I should come
down and sort it out for you, if you want the right results !!!
G3KEV
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: E field active antennas
If you'd bothered to read the post, you'd have seen it was for a work
related task where we want a broad band active Rx antenna for the
whole HF band..
Can you tell me how to get any other sort of antenna that will allow
the whole HF band to be covered, in real time at high speed.?
If you can, and it works on high power Tx as well, then you've solved
the holy grail and stand to make millions of pounds!
Contrary to Mal's all pervading wisdom in all things RF related, a
long high tuned piece of wire is not the answer to all radio problems.
Oh, and a loop is no good, any directionality is a definite no-no.
If project funding permits, I may try an active horizontal loop in
addition. A 0.5m diameter loop into a broadband, balanced, common
base amplifier with Zin < 0.5ohms ought to give a reasonably flat
horizontally polarised omni directional HF band Rx coverage for
skywave signals.
Andy G4JNT
www.scrbg.org/g4jnt
2008/12/5 mal hamilton <[email protected]>:
Try a piece of wire as long and high as possible and an ATU this is
superior
to any active antenna or loop for that matter, the loop only helps in a
noisy environment, and even then not always.
G3KEV
----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Talbot"
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 4:22 PM
Subject: LF: E field active antennas
Having just had to make an active antenna for HF (for gainful
employment-type work, not Am. radio purposes. The commercially made
one we've ordered is on five weeks delivery and it was needed before
yesterday) I was wondering about a helical element.
As the thing had to be resonably lightweight, I made the antenna
element from copper tape on 15mm plastic water pipe rather than use a
solid copper tube. Just for a bit of novelty I wound the tape in a
helix, but then started wondering if doing that would make any
difference to performance. Normally, helically winding an antenna
(rubber duck type at V/UHF) only serves to distribute loading
inductance into a short antenna to make it resonate - unlikely to
change improve the loss terms at all. But I did wonder if the added
extra inductance, or increased conductor length (not element length -
that is 1.2m) would change the performance significantly from a
straight tube.
Does anyone have any ideas - food for thought if nothing else? The
base amplifier is one I've used several times before for V/LF up to HF
based around a J310 source follower running at 20mA with bootstrapped
input followed by a 2N5109 emiter follower at Ic = 80mA. I may have
published it way-back-when in the amateur press in the 73kHz days.
Not the best design judging by some of those published in more recent
years, but did mean all the components were to hand for an instant
job.
Andy G4JNT
www.scrbg.org/g4jnt
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.14/1831 - Release Date:
12/4/2008
9:55 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.14/1831 - Release Date: 12/4/2008
9:55 PM
|
