To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: RE: Survival |
From: | "mal" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 6 May 2008 12:37:29 -0000 |
References: | <[email protected]> <004c01c8aeed$a825a260$0d00000a@AGB> <007401c8aef5$41936b60$0301a8c0@g3kev> <003f01c8aefb$8c023b80$0d00000a@AGB> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Smoke signals are not secure too many onlookers. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Johan H. Bodin" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 5:33 AM Subject: Re: LF: RE: Survival > Alberto di Bene wrote: > > Every ham should be very proficient in smoke signaling. > > That should be a main topic of the license examination <VBG> > > Yes! I would like to hear QUP2 more often on the bands. > > Johan SM6LKM > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.8/1413 - Release Date: 03/05/2008 11:22 > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: RE: ZAP, mal |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Survival, Andy Talbot |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: Survival, Johan H. Bodin |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: RE: Survival, Graham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |