To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: RE: Survival |
From: | Alberto di Bene <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 06 May 2008 18:31:49 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <006001c8af8f$7353b930$0e00000a@AGB> |
References: | <[email protected]> <004c01c8aeed$a825a260$0d00000a@AGB> <007401c8aef5$41936b60$0301a8c0@g3kev> <003f01c8aefb$8c023b80$0d00000a@AGB> <[email protected]> <006001c8af8f$7353b930$0e00000a@AGB> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) |
Z-usanet-msgid: | XID426meFqf10181X38 |
Graham wrote: Smoke signals..... I would think a slight problem would be finding something that would burn or if you did , distinguishing it from everything else that was burning ? That could be addressed with the use of a strong encryption code, which could also solve the problem of onlookers... A sort of public key RSA, where you have the guarantee of the authenticity of the sender. Or more simply, a set of smoke signals could be used as a preamble for the subsequent message... <vbg> 73 Alberto I2PHD |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: RE: Survival, Graham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: RE: ZAP, mal |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: RE: Survival, Graham |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: RE: Survival, mal |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |