LF: Re: Rugby - Anthorn

["Alan Melia" <alan.melia@btinternet.com>]

Hi Alberto thanks for that I am quite interested and there is no doubt that
even around the UK Anthorn does not seem to provide as big a signal as Rugby
did. I have a feeling they may be using 5dB less power, "but dont quote me"
as the politicians say !! You have a 20dB diffference which is remarkable I
will report that to NPL if I may.
You location is I think " near Milan " ??
er I can't listen cos my Winrad has expired....nudge nudge.

Cheers de Alan G3NYK


----- Original Message -----
From: Alberto di Bene <dibene@usa.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: 14 May 2007 22:50
Subject: LF: Rugby - Anthorn


> The recent move of the 60 kHz time/frequency reference station from Rugby
to Anthorn has considerably contributed to the
> diminution of RF pollution, at least here where I live... :-)
> Rugby was S9 on average, using the Roelof active whip, while Anthorn
rarely exceeds S3...
>
> I thought I had to report this change of signal strength, even if it
probably is of no interest for the majority of
> you... :-)
>
> 73  Alberto  I2PHD
>
>
>