Hi Dave
It that was you, you were obscenely strong here :-)) no-one should be
allowed to be that strong with 100mW !! it was 40dB above the nose
here.....not many get that high on 500k.
Yes I dont think the "static" travels quite so far or so well as on 136, the
nearest was south-western France of the eastern German boarder....more
attenuation in daylight as well.
Cheers de Alan G3NYK
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave G3WCB <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: 14 May 2007 21:01
Subject: LF: [500] Dead Band?
> Ah, sorry.. That was probably me!
>
> I spent the week-end listening on 137 kHz, and have just re-set my antenna
> for this band. 137 kHz was pretty much wiped out because of high static
> levels. Strangely, 500 kHz seems to be affected less by T-storm static
than
> 137 kHz.
>
> 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Alan Melia
> Sent: 14 May 2007 19:53
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: LF: Re: Dead Band?
>
>
> There is a strong carrier on 503.33 I think it must be G3UNT from the
> strength.
>
> Alan G3NYK
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: 14 May 2007 19:36
> Subject: LF: Dead Band?
>
>
> >
> > I am calling CQ just below 502. Not a sausage around tonight apart from
> > G3YVF testing his loft antenna for 502!
> >
> > Anybody around tonight?
> >
> >
> >
> > G3VTT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
|
