To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: What's the best receiver? |
From: | "PA0WFO" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 6 Mar 2006 20:04:09 +0100 |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
References: | <[email protected]> <001b01c64072$4060e860$02423850@MARLEEN> <00e701c6414f$8b8c5710$61ec4454@MLB> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Good luck Martin ,
Hope to hear your results
,
73, William Oorschot
PA0WFO
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Evans." <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: LF: What's the best
receiver? > I am using a rather old Kenwood TS940 with Dave,s pre- amp which performs > very well with a built in 270 Hz crystal-filter combined with the built in > Audio Peak Filter which reduces a lot of noise .The S-meter calibration will > be 50 microvolts for S9 if you put an adjustable attenuator ( a simple > potmeter will do ) between the pre-amp and the receiver . > > 73,William PA0WFO > > ################################### > > Thanks for this, William. > > Yes, this is what I am going to try - quick and easy. > > Next to get the antenna resonated properly! > > 73s > > Martin > > GW3UCJ. > > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: What's the best receiver?, Martin Evans. |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Signal 136.330KHz, Gary - G4WGT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: What's the best receiver?, Martin Evans. |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: What's the best receiver?, G0MRF |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |