Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Mini Whip and local noise

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Mini Whip and local noise
From: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:23:30 -0000
Delivery-date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:07:27 +0000
Envelope-to: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]> <016101c61d02$12ceca40$2101a8c0@pcroelof> <002b01c61d54$c510aaa0$20347ad5@w4o8m9> <013401c621bd$c7f33c20$2101a8c0@pcroelof> <000001c621d9$6ee29240$67b0fea9@lark> <000b01c621df$f54a2ae0$2101a8c0@pcroelof>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Hello Roelof

You said:

One of the tests I did was on the second floor of a large concrete
community
building.
I have performed some height test as well and found the following figures:

height               rel. dB
=================
1.2 m / 4 ft            0 dB
2.4 m / 8 ft         + 4 dB
3.6 m / 12 ft       + 6 dB
4.8 m / 16 ft       + 8 dB

Shielding by bushes in my garden has also been noted. I had to raise it
above these to restore a good s/n ratio. On the other hand, at an open
field
near a lake it worked first class 2 metre high and raising it improved
signal strength but not the signal to noise ratio.

These results are in line with tests done by G3GRO a couple of years ago
with a short electrostatic whip antenna.

I have the amplifier and coax voltage supply board for a electrostatic
antenna used at the Decca transmitter sites. The original antenna  was a
copper cylinder fixed only a metre or so above ground. I am not sure what
they were used for - I guess Walter would know.

Peter, G3LDO




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>