Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Mini Whip and local noise

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: Mini Whip and local noise
From: "MIKE REID" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:24:45 -0600
Delivery-date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:25:44 +0000
Envelope-to: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]> <016101c61d02$12ceca40$2101a8c0@pcroelof> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <000901c61dac$20298450$ee9bfea9@oben> <007201c61ddc$b0d668d0$2101a8c0@pcroelof>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Seal-send-time: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:24:45 -0600
Sender: [email protected]
I have samples of the 2N5109 on their way here.
That's the link to the manufacturer's webpage where they offer free samples. The J310 is also a free sample from Fairchild Semiconductors.
 
Mike
WE0H
WD2XGI
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Roelof Bakker
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 10:15 AM
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Mini Whip and local noise

Hello Peter and all,

It seems that this transistor is no longer available. However, there is no
real need for it as the J310 has been tested for IP2 and IP3 in the same
test setup. At 12 V and a bias current of 10 mA the J310 has a IP2 of + 69
dBm and a IP3 of + 33.5 dBm, 1 dB compression point is in excess of + 22
dBm.

Computer simulation of the J310 has confirmed these figures (or should I say
vice versa?) Though the active device is important in a whip design, it is
only part of a system. There is not much use to put much effort into
acchieving the best possible performance, when this is not necessary for the
reception system as a whole.

73 Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>