Re: LF: ID?

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: ID?
From:	"John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date:	Thu, 27 Dec 2001 07:29:17 -0500
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>

Mal,

I will be running screen captures on 135.922 tonight from 2300 until about
0200, set for 60 second dots. Will be happy to see if I can get a complete
ID.

John Andrews, W1TAG

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: 73 kHz last night, (continued) LF: 73 kHz last night, John Andrews LF: 136, john currie LF: 136, john currie LF: 136, john currie Re: LF: 136, MarkusVester LF: 136, john currie Re: LF: 136, gii3kev LF: 136, john currie LF: ID?, John Andrews Re: LF: ID?, gii3kev Re: LF: ID?, John Andrews <= Re: LF: ID?, gii3kev Re: LF: ID?, Steve Olney Re: LF: ID?, gii3kev Re: LF: ID?, Steve Olney LF: 136, john currie Re: LF: 136, gii3kev Re: LF: 136, john currie Re: LF: 136, John Andrews Re: LF: 136, john currie Re: LF: 136, John Andrews

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: ID?, gii3kev
Next by Date:	Re: LF: SpecLab generates DFCW, QRSS and 7FSK, John Rabson
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: ID?, gii3kev
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: ID?, gii3kev
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]