Having suffered a major virus attack at work earlier this year I have no
hesitation in recommending Norton that checks emails both in and out. The
hoax viruses are a big problem and as they don't need any attachments they
will slip through the net. I have never understood why Microsoft doesn't
make it much more difficult for the unknowing to access the windows
directory or any of the hardware / networking controls.
Martin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 9:58 PM
Subject: LF: Virus Alert! HOAX HOAX
G'day All,
I have subscribed recently to an anti-virus program. I won't tell you
which one unless I receive direct inquiries as I don't want to put
commercial recommendations up here. It only costs US$20 p.a. (OK, so
that
narrows it down a bit :-) for which I receive notifications and updates
nearly everyday. I usually update my virus data files every couple of
days (done automatically with a few clicks in the background as I am
reading
my emails). When I received one of those SULFNBK.EXE hoax emails I
already knew about it several days prior. Forewarned is for-armed.
Happy New Year !!!!!
73s Steve VK2ZTO
| 