To: | "LF Group \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Dipole antenna at LF |
From: | "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:31:50 -0000 |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
A new subject now
.....
Someone must have
already tried this, but how effective would a (say) 100m long dipole laid down a
chalk hill be ?
Isn't limestone also
the same material as chalk, Are there any CREG members
reading this who know about conductivity of rocks?
Chalk is a very poor
conductor, even when wet. A 4m earthing rod driven into the top of
Portsdown Hill on the South coast of the UK in an attempt to make an RF
ground measured 120 ohms to mains Earth - attempt abandoned in favour of a
dipole !
There are plenty of chalk hills of this
sort of height, and the amount of wire needed - 500m perhaps - means the
radiation resistance will rise to an acceptable figure to reduce copper
loss.
Andy
G4JNT
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: Transmitting tests on 137.790, Talbot Andrew |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Is this DCF39?, john sexton |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Caged Coils, MAL HAMILTON |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Dipole antenna at LF, Mike Dennison |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |