Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+1\.6\s+Hz\s+from\s+Kiruna\?\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+1\.6\s+Hz\s+from\s+Kiruna\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna? (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 06:56:26 -0500; Hi Tom, David, I'm not aware of a functional "Tesla Antenna" concept. The mentioning of the Kiruna site suggests that those low frequency carriers might be have been created by ionospheric heating, w; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00211.html (12,698 bytes)
2. Re: VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna? (score: 1): Author: David Hine <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 17:30:43 +0000 (UTC); Hi Tom and Markus, This is the very reason I am reluctant to give out the Tesla TX radio method details. The counter-arguments are already rapidly building here against it, but I can assure you those; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00222.html (17,670 bytes)
3. RE: VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna? (score: 1): Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 18:52:18 +0100; Hi David, ... Maybe you can disclose at least the the 3dB BW of this kind of antenna? 73 Clemens DL4RAJ; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00223.html (9,895 bytes)
4. Re: VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna? (score: 1): Author: David Hine <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 18:12:42 +0000 (UTC); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00224.html (13,853 bytes)
5. RE: VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna? (score: 1): Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 20:42:06 +0100; Hi David, The 3 dB bandwidth is f0/Q and Q is defined as X/R where X is the reactance of the inductor and the capacitor at the resonant frequency. The lossless-Q of a small antenna is a useful academ; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00227.html (10,929 bytes)
6. Re: VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna? (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 15:25:35 -0500; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00228.html (13,561 bytes)
7. Re: VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna? (score: 1): Author: David Hine <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 20:40:57 +0000 (UTC); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00230.html (14,662 bytes)
8. Re: VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna? (score: 1): Author: David Hine <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 20:57:14 +0000 (UTC); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00233.html (16,912 bytes)
9. Re: VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna? (score: 1): Author: VIGILANT Luis Fernández <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 21:36:01 +0000; Hi David, Clemens, Markus. ELF ! :-O I have searched about Kiruna observatory and found the page which shows the magnetic pulsations daily. There is really an interesting signal at about 1.6Hz during; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00236.html (16,397 bytes)
10. Re: VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna? (score: 1): Author: David Hine <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 22:12:18 +0000 (UTC); Hi Luis, If you scroll back from March 2015, you will find more 1.6 Hz signals. Search the Haarp records from that period for more evidence. Look on YouTube under 'Haarp Conspiracy' to see the 1.6 an; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00238.html (20,698 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]